Between 2018 and late 2021, institutional investors aggressively entered the single-family rental space, accounting for up to 18.2% of all home purchases by Q4 2021, up from just 11.8% in 2018, according to Redfin. But by late 2022, that activity fell off a cliff. Institutional purchases dropped more than 45% year-over-year, and in some markets, pulled back by over 80%.
While many pointed to rising interest rates as the obvious reason, the full story runs deeper. Understanding that story is key if you’re looking to invest intelligently and ahead of the next institutional surge.
Market Evolution Since 2018
Over the last five to seven years, three major shifts have reshaped the investment landscape: operational sophistication, financing volatility, and inventory movement.
Service partners from construction crews to insurance brokers to property managers leveled up. This evolution gave operators the tools to scale efficiently and squeeze out higher NOI. As a result, more investors began pursuing innovative models like co-living, shared ownership, and short-term rentals, moving beyond traditional buy-and-hold.
Meanwhile, the capital markets grew increasingly unpredictable. Government agencies briefly entered the space only to exit just as fast, and securitization markets became stop-and-go, leaving large-scale financing fragmented and unreliable. Institutional capital doesn’t just look for low rates, it needs long-term stability to deploy at scale.
As Sean Tierney, VP at Entera, notes, many large buyers are still waiting for the 10-Year Treasury to settle in the 4.2% to 4.5% range before committing. With yields hovering around 4.43% as of May 2025, that stability is close but not quite locked in.
Inventory: A Mixed Picture
The inventory story paints an even more segmented picture. In 2022, national MLS listings dipped below 400,000 homes, igniting a fierce acquisition scramble. Today, listings have rebounded to around 980,000, but this number doesn’t reflect the sharp variation from one market to the next.
Cities like Charlotte and Dallas remain inventory-constrained and stable, attracting both institutional and retail investor interest. In contrast, secondary and tertiary markets such as Port Charlotte, FL, and Lehigh Acres, FL, are flooded, each with more than 10,000 homes for sale. These hyper-local imbalances make market selection more critical than ever.
Why Institutions Pulled Back
Interest rates weren’t the only trigger. Many institutional investors could have weathered the higher borrowing costs. What really halted their momentum was their inability to reallocate capital.
When commercial real estate, especially Class A offices, started to decline in value, funds got stuck holding billions in underperforming assets. It would have been necessary for them to divest these holdings at steep discounts, often 40–60 cents on the dollar, to reposition capital into SFR. That was a tough pitch internally. Institutional capital doesn’t move unless the rest of the portfolio can move with it.
Beyond capital logistics, internal prioritization played a role. Even when SFR showed healthy fundamentals, rent growth, home appreciation, and low vacancy, many funds favored multifamily or industrial assets with longer track records and simpler operational footprints. SFR had to wait for its turn.
Finally, past mistakes left scars. Between 2015 and 2018, some of the biggest players moved too fast, acquiring homes at scale without proper systems in place. The result? High vacancy rates, NOI compression, and costly lessons. Those early missteps forced institutions to slow down, improve processes, and rebuild acquisition infrastructure more cautiously.
Where Things Stand in 2025
Institutions haven’t disappeared; they’re just being selective. Many are still in a net-disposition mode. For every property being acquired, about 1.75 are being sold. However, signs of a turnaround are showing. In stable, yield-consistent markets like Charlotte, Dallas, and parts of the Midwest, large buyers are quietly resuming activity.
Still, few are re-entering the scattered-site rental game with the aggression of 2019 or 2021. Instead, institutional capital is flowing into Build-to-Rent (BTR) communities. The appeal is simple: BTR projects resemble multifamily, offering centralized operations, easier maintenance, and underwriting familiarity. BTR completions rose 35% year-over-year in 2024 and remain a top target for institutional allocations in 2025.
What It Means for Individual Investors
If you’re an independent investor, this moment presents a real opportunity. Institutional competition has thinned in many markets, particularly in overbuilt or higher-risk metros. That means better pricing, more flexible terms, and less bidding pressure if you’re operating in the right places.
It also means you have a head start. Once rate stability is confirmed and institutional capital regains full access to redeployable assets, competition will return, and fast. Large firms move in waves, but when they move, they move with scale. The window to buy ahead of that surge is now.
At the same time, don’t let national trends mislead your strategy. Today’s market is fragmented. Your edge lies in local execution: knowing your inventory, rent growth, and absorption rates better than the institutional models can.
Final Takeaway
Institutional investors didn’t leave because single-family rentals stopped working. They paused because their money got stuck in other parts of the portfolio. Now, with the bond market stabilizing and capital gradually loosening, they’re inching back but with caution, precision, and a strong bias toward familiar markets.
That gives individual investors a rare advantage. Whether you’re flipping, renting, or building new inventory, this cycle favors those who can move decisively and locally. If you’re prepared, this is your window to scale before institutional capital crowds the space again.
Need funding to capitalize while the window’s open? Dominion Financial offers 24-hour pre-approvals and fast closings; no appraisals, no delays. Apply now to secure your next deal.
