Episode Summary:
Overview on Episode 46
Craig Fuhr and Jack BeVier discuss recent legislation targeting large institutional investors in single-family homes. Several states, including California and Minnesota, have proposed or considered restrictions on institutional ownership. These restrictions aim to curb high-volume homeownership by institutions, especially those owning properties nationwide.
Legislative Push Against Institutional Investors
In California, a proposed bill bans companies with over 1,000 homes nationwide from buying additional California properties. Minnesota also introduced a similar bill to limit institutional ownership of more than ten properties within the state. Though it didn’t pass, proponents are likely to revisit it.
Institutional Ownership Impact on Home Affordability
Many argue that institutional ownership drives up home prices, limiting opportunities for individual homebuyers. Fuhr and BeVier examine how these restrictions on institutional investors could ultimately impact home affordability and whether such policies achieve their intended goals.
NRHC’s Advocacy Against Restrictive Legislation
The National Rental Home Council (NRHC) actively opposes restrictions on institutional investors. They believe limiting institutional ownership could exacerbate housing shortages and harm affordability. NRHC members argue that restricting capital flows will reduce rental housing stock, affecting rent prices negatively.
Institutional Investment Trends in Housing Supply
Fuhr notes that despite criticism, institutional investors only own about 5% of single-family rental properties in the U.S. Yet, in some markets, they control as much as 30%, notably influencing prices and availability in specific regions.
Wall Street’s Long-Term Strategy with DSCR Loans
The conversation shifts to Wall Street’s role in DSCR loans for rental properties. BeVier highlights how large institutions could potentially benefit from acquiring more properties if investors default, especially under DSCR-backed loans with favorable terms.
Outlook: Will Restrictions Continue to Tighten?
Fuhr and BeVier expect more attention on restricting institutional investors, suggesting real estate professionals keep a close watch on these legislative trends.